Related Posts

8 Comments Already

commenter
oliver Said,
March 22nd, 2010 @9:51 am  

That is one of the worst ideas I’ve ever read. You are just marking the folder as hidden and system, and it is not actually “locked” in any sense at all. The only reason it is not shown anymore is by virtue of the windows folder settings being currently set to not show system files and folders.

Not only that but you are advocating saving a “password” in completely plaintext, and I use the term “password” loosely, as it is possible to circumvent your method of hiding the folder without knowing it at all.

Do people a favour and don’t suggest a solution to such a problem which doesn’t actually do anything like what you claim it does. If anything, it actually makes the system less secure, if like many people the user uses the same password everywhere. They have now put their password in a plain text file for anyone to observe.

commenter
ChiliJoe Said,
March 22nd, 2010 @4:34 pm  

To add to oliver’s comments, your suggestion of protecting the password is moot. Anyone who can read and understand what the script can easily figure out the “password” is not necessary.

commenter
danibbo Said,
March 22nd, 2010 @6:36 pm  

This isn’t secure, it’s just obfuscation. And it will still end up in file scans.

It would be better if you put the password in a separate location (eg a USB key) but even then it’s pretty bad. If I see LockCode.bat I’m going to know exactly how to get their files.

commenter
Tyris Said,
March 22nd, 2010 @9:39 pm  

I agree with Oliver… this isn’t a valid solution by any stretch of the imagination…The password provides nothing at all, since it only actually matches for a password when you open the batch file to tell it to ask for a password……

The exact same solution without being quite as retarded would be to replace the entire IF/GOTO line with:

if 1==2 goto FAIL
1==1 means it cant unlock the file
1==2 means it will always unlock the file
(Since your editing the file to put your password in anyway!)

Then at the very least this will block the computer illiterate from accessing your folder…

Better yet, right click folder, click properties, tick “hidden”. Then to view/hide it, enable/disable the view hidden folders option in Windows? Same thing…

commenter
Tyris Said,
March 22nd, 2010 @9:44 pm  

Following my previous post… it appears there is at least some cleverness in this approach. When you rename a folder to “Control Panel.{21EC2020-3AEA-1069-A2DD-08002B30309D}”, it becomes a link to control panel (so “opening it will not access the folder contents). Simply changing the name to something else unlocks it though, so still very insecure for people who know what they’re doing.

If people are serious about their file security then they should use truecrypt. (google it)

commenter
Robert Burke Said,
March 23rd, 2010 @1:19 pm  

Furthermore, it doesn’t even have to have the “Control Panel” in front of the “.{…}” it can be any word. It’s the “.{…}” that makes it “hidden”.

I used to use a program built in VB, a long time ago, that did the same thing.

commenter
Joe Said,
March 23rd, 2010 @3:26 pm  

This is an impressive hack… if you’re a clueless 11 year-old trying to hide pictures of boobies from your parents.

Unfortunately this site claims to offer Computer Tips for IT Pros and in that context it is a contemptibly stupid suggestion.

commenter
TuxDK Said,
March 31st, 2010 @8:14 am  

as far as I can tell, any script kiddie could open your bat, input their own pass and then “unlock” your file with that pass.

anywho…
If you want a fast/easy way to hide files and it doesn’t need to be secure, then make a hidden partition on your drive.
accessing the drive is as easy as entering the drive path in an explorer directory line. This should keep all computer illiterates out and even the occasional geek (as long as they don’t have any reason to be checking your partition table).

and of course if you want the secure method, you can use truecrypt. It does cost you a bit of performance though and it is a bit more of a hassle, so it’s a tradeoff of security vs ease-of-use

Please Leave Your Comments Below

Please Note: All comments will be moderated