Related Posts

6 Comments Already

commenter
Kevin Kuybus Said,
January 8th, 2010 @11:08 am  

Its a great method to connecting two computers using a crossover cable. Thanks for sharing such nice information. It was very valuable.

commenter
aelfric Said,
January 8th, 2010 @4:30 pm  

If I might just add a little bit of clarification and expansion on some of the points above. If you have two computers with gigabit interfaces then do not use a crossover cable as that will limit the connection to 100Mbs, for a gigabit connection you must use a straight through cable, cat 5e or better.

The important thing about netmasks is that they should be consistent and allow for all computers on that segment, apart from that you can use almost anything you like on a private network. As there are only two computers on this segment you could use anything from 128.0.0.0 to 255.255.255.252. Using the default class c netmask of 255.255.255.0 is fine but not essential.

Absolutely no need for a default gateway to be set, there is no way off this network and even if you do set it, it could be different on each computer without affecting anything.

Keep up the good work.

commenter
Trevnew Said,
January 15th, 2010 @2:43 am  

Interesting what you are saying about the cat5 cables I tried this to connect 2 pcs together one running XP Pro and one running Win7 with GB network cards and both show a gb connection with crossover cable but I’ve not used anything to check the actual transfer speed, how can you connect 2 pcs directly with a staight through cable?

The issue with this arrangement that I cant seem to resolve is:

Both pcs have wireless connection and it all works fine with the addition of the cross over cable. I transfer large amounts of data between the 2 pcs and need the systems to use the crossover cable route for this action.

BUT for some reason the data transfer periodically seems to attempt to use the wireless router path and of course a significant slowing in the transfer. I can check the connection on the cable and it is good. I’ve tried with both fixed and DCHP ip configuration.

My question is when moving data between pcs is it possible to force on the wired path and achieve the high throughput needed?

Thanks

commenter
la-cabra Said,
January 20th, 2010 @10:47 am  

Trevnew, have you tried disabling the wireless card while doing the transfers?

commenter
Trevnew Said,
January 21st, 2010 @12:50 pm  

la-cabara,

Thanks for the suggestion but no I haven’t, they work concurrently and independantly of each other 70% of the time and having to disable cards everytime I use it sort of defeats the object of a process running in the background. I’m sure if i did disable it would work 100% but that is not what I’m trying to achieve

Cheers

commenter
bakus Said,
February 15th, 2010 @5:30 am  

I want to connect XP with a windows server 2003 via crossover cable. Is it possible to happen? I ping the address of each other but no connection is there.

Please Leave Your Comments Below

Please Note: All comments will be moderated